M The New York Art World ®"All You Need To Know."
M The New York Art World ®"All You Need To Know."

art reviews



East and West
A Conversation with Pearl Lam
By M. Brendon MacInnis

And, Who Are You? Work from Saachi Online
Sara Tecchia Roma Gallery >>

By Joyce Korotkin

Jean Lowe
McKenzie Fine Art >>

By Mary Hrbacek


e-mailE-Mail This Article

East and West
A Conversation with Pearl Lam
By M. Brendon MacInnis


Pearl Lam, the founding director of Costrasts Gallery, based in Shanghai but with affiliates around the world, discusses collecting art in today’s China. Her gallery’s stated mission is to explore Western and Eastern influences on art, looking at the relationships between art, architecture, and design without prejudice. The gallery also commissions pieces from designers worldwide, and operates an artist in residency program. The focus of our conversation centers around a New York based artist (born in Madrid) Isidro Blasco, whose work is on view at Contrasts Gallery’s special exhibition space in Shanghai at 500 S. Ruijin Road, Building No. 4, from April 27 – June 7, 2008.

You’ve got a couple of gallery spaces in Shanghai and a gallery in London. What’s that all about?

Well, I opened a gallery in 1993…

You opened a gallery in Shanghai?

In 1993, I opened a gallery in Hong Kong. Then in 2003 and 2004, I did a show in the French Concession District [in Shanghai]. The only reason opened in China, in Shanghai and Beijing, is I wanted to cultivate Chinese collectors. I don’t need to make a living from the gallery, that’s my advantage. Today, most gallery owners are like investors who watch the auction prices. For them, art is little more than a commodity, it’s like playing the stock market.

When you say you want to cultivate the Chinese collectors, what do you want these Chinese collectors to collect? Chinese artists?

Of course. Chinese collectors already collect contemporary work, but it’s work that is rooted in the culture here. They collect from a Chinese perspective. I don’t say that’s wrong, but what I want to open up, for the Chinese, the idea to look at it from a different perspective, an international perspective.

So, what caught your attention with Isidro’s work?

Isidro’s work is very different, it’s difficult for the Chinese market. Because the Chinese, in terms of the art market, the Chinese do not like the photograph; they don’t collect photography.

Well, he doesn’t actually do photography…

Yeah, but these are photo sculptures. I like it; I like the photo sculptures because it looks like the scaffolding of old Chinese architecture. And what is important about the development of China these days is the urban development, where there has been this complete destruction.

You mean in Shanghai?

No, Shanghai is the best! I mean in Beijing. If you look at Beijing, Beijing is horrible. It’s a completely new, sci-fi city, without consideration to preserve anything.

Well, I’ve never been there.

Actually, Shanghai, when you look a what Isidro is doing in all of his painting, I mean in all of his sculptures, he is only focusing on the Chinese architecture, the old buildings where very common people live. Having said that, of course, Shanghai history is only starting in 1848. Shanghai is not a Chinese city, by and large. There is no distinctly Chinese architecture here, except the gardens.

I see.

What Shanghai has is this melting of all cultures, which has been here since the nineteenth century and on to the Japanese occupation.

Actually, Shanghai reminds me of New York in some ways, the melting pot idea. So, getting back to the art market in China, it sounds like you want to open things up to an international perspective?

Well, actually I have changed my thinking while doing this. It’s not about international thinking, because I see the gallery itself as having a cross-cultural impact. What the Chinese are collecting is absolutely correct, because, after all, we’ve never gone through all of these expressions. Why should the Chinese follow the West? We haven’t gone through this historical moment, you know? I mean, of the West. The thing is, it’s even more important today; we really need to have that cultural exchange because I think the Chinese have to understand, for example, why the West is doing Conceptualism and all of the art that they [Chinese collectors] find intimidating.

It’s also true that, from a western perspective, in architecture, you have Frank Lloyd Wright borrowing heavily from an Asian aesthetic. Then you have the influence of Japanese woodcuts on the French; Van Gogh copied them, Degas...

The Japanese have a lot to do with China. The core of the Japanese culture is based on the Chinese.

Well, it’s all connected. If we look at music too, in America you had in the 1960s the so-called British invasion of rock music, with the Beatles and the Stones bringing this music back to where it came from; while most Americans at the time thought this was something new coming from England. And then certainly in painting, you have an Asian aesthetic in the early Impressionists…

But the thing is, you have to remember that today, western art is not concerned with aesthetics, whereas the Chinese are still focusing on aesthetics. That’s the main difference. And the West doesn’t understand China. The West always insists on the western domination of contemporary art.


And I think that by opening the gallery, it gives an international push to contemporary art. In China, we’ll go through the same thing, but it will be different in the history. There isn’t the hierarchy between art, design, and decorative art. So, all of that makes it very different. Also in Japan, you don’t have this hierarchy.

You mean the hierarchy between decorative art, and fine art?

Fine art, design, and decorative art — this hierarchy thing doesn’t exist here. First of all, all artists are multi-discipline.

Is that a good thing, actually?

Well, if you look at our history, I mean, our porcelain prices today; the price for a porcelain is much higher than for a landscape painting. This is because it’s based on the quality. Art is not made to sell. Artists were invited into the court of the emperor, they were held in esteem. But in the West, the artist is usually working class, they have to sell work to get by.

Well, Europe also had the royal court…

Until the twentieth century. But the Chinese artist makes art, supposedly for self-cultivation. That was a complete, different approach — very, very different. And the problem of today’s world, of the Chinese artist, is we have adopted, totally, the approach of the West. Which is to make art for money. In olden times, we would call them craftsmen. We don’t call them artists.


That’s why, if you look at most Chinese art today, they’re just copying blindly the western theory. I mean, it’s not even the western theory; they are adapting the western Conceptualism without even understanding what Conceptualism is, Abstract Conceptualism. So, they only adapt a very superficial aspect.

But I got the impression, from talking with Isidro, that you show a lot of design, decorative work in your galleries?

It’s the only gallery that does art and design, together. Because I’ve taken everything back, back to our traditional Chinese culture. Our traditional Chinese culture has no subjugation, between art, design and decorative art. I’ve taken this whole thing as the foundation of the gallery; I am not following the model of the western gallery. Because I don’t think it…

I get the point. I think that in architecture, too, there is a similar evolution in how we regard the architect. Now we’ve got starchitects…

Architecture is a very different thing, after the Second World War. Everything now is Modernism, you have concrete jungles over the whole world. Architecture is a complete loss in Japan. Every single country where you had something original, it’s gone. The only thing you can produce since after the Second World War is mass architecture; and the saddest thing is that now it’s all based on the western aesthetic and concept. All of our old, beautiful Chinese architecture is gone; it’s all gone. There is nothing evolved from our past. And it’s not just us, in India; it’s the same thing. Nothing is original, relating to a unique culture. Everything is in the international language. That’s the success of globalization, to create one, homogenous culture. And that’s also the saddest thing.

Well, I think it’s basically just laziness. People want the convenience of the predictable.

No, it’s not laziness; I think it’s the educational background, and also many other reasons. It’s because the developer wants it built fast, and they are only focused on the price per square foot, to get maximum usage. Buildings are really what represent a civilization, and we’ve lost it, completely, in the twenty-first century. And the saddest thing is that art; art is going that way too.


It’s a western domination of contemporary art. Everybody is referencing the West, to measure what’s good, without regard to their own cultural heritage. And that is why, after I decided to open the gallery, in China, I had to do something very different. I had to show China what the West is; why they have very different art; and why we have very different art. Even with our cultural exchange, we should not lose ourselves. We should be who we are.

Ed. Note: Isidro Blasco’s photography-based sculptures and wall works will be on view at Contrasts Gallery’s special exhibition space in Shanghai at 500 S. Ruijin Road, Building No. 4, from April 27 – June 7, 2008. The exhibition When I Look At It will feature seventeen of the artist’s constructions, using photographs that were taken in Shanghai. An opening reception will be held April 26, from 5-8pm.

e-mailE-Mail This Article

And, Who Are You? Work from Saachi Online
Sara Tecchia Roma Gallery

By Joyce Korotkin


In a perfect world, one would expect that great contemporary art would rise like cream to the top, seemingly of its own accord. But in today’s imperfect art world, more often than not, nepotism fueled by a frenzied, investment-driven marketplace, rules the stars. Those who work in the art world (be it as artists, curators, art dealers, collectors or critics) know only too well the gritty reality: that in today’s lucrative, global yet elitist art market, artists careers are either electrified by celebrity or short circuited, based upon an elaborate hierarchy of social and political networking. How skillfully an artist negotiates the rules of this system — such as by attending endless rounds of exhibition openings and parties, graduating from the right schools, meeting the right people, getting recommended to dealers/curators, and the like — makes or breaks a career.

Despite the increasing number of galleries that appear as if overnight, and despite the almost absurd proliferation of art fairs, replete with piggybacked ancillary fairs, annuals, biennales and festivals that have exponentially increased the venues for exhibitions and commerce — and although there seems to be no dearth of collectors eager to buy (according to the sales statistics from art fairs and auctions) — the majority of artists doing great work vastly overwhelms the existing spaces in which to show them. The actual number of contemporary artists who achieve recognition from among the hundreds of thousands who don’t is woefully small. The view from the perspective of collectors is equally grim; since desirable artists’ works are judiciously “placed” by their dealers in favored collections, collectors often find themselves jockeying for positions on select waiting lists.

None of this is news; it is, rather, the status quo of the art marketplace today.
Enter Charles Saatchi, the British art collector/gallerist who in 1997 created a sensation with Sensation, an exhibition of young British artists that took place at the Royal Academy of Art in London and later toured to Berlin and New York. The show made international superstars of Damien Hirst and Chris Ofili, while burnishing London’s newly minted image as a hip center of cutting edge art. Now Saatchi is at the forefront again, with the launching last year of the innovative Saatchi Online’s “your gallery,” (http://www.saatchi-gallery.co.uk/yourgallery/).

This free website for artists (and the artworld at large) represents a radical development in the art marketplace. Extraordinary in its scope and democratic approach, the site levels the playing field for some 80,000 artists who are already registered on it.

Dubbed, “your gallery,” it exists as a floating gallery in cyberspace, buoyed by the cache of the Saatchi name. It is a gallery with no directors, walls or boundaries of any sort — operating like an open market in a public square. Any artist from anywhere on the planet who chooses to upload a page of his/her work on the site can do so, whether emerging or known, young or old. Anyone from anywhere on the planet who chooses to peruse the site can read its numerous sections, contact artists directly to buy work or arrange shows, or just chat.

All of this is free; Saatchi Online charges no commissions or fees whatsoever for artist registration, and takes no commissions from sales. To be sure, it remains to be seen whether this site is a harbinger of the times, or if it exists because of the times.

Not surprisingly, since its debut, the your gallery site has expanded into an enormous online network that regularly gets 50 million hits per day from users around the globe — 30% from USA, 30% from Europe and 30% from the EU and the rest of the world (Source Awstats); with sales of art from the site within the first year topping some 130 million dollars. Currently placed at number 235 on the Alexa Research Top 100,000 Websites in the World, it already outranks the Metropolitan Museum in New York (at 23,370), the Museum of Modern Art in New York (at32,360), and London’s The Tate (at 61,506).

While its main purpose is to promote the artists registered on it, in cyberspace, your gallery is taking its first steps into real time and space, with its first exhibition in a “brick and mortar” gallery in New York, entitled AND WHO ARE YOU? Work from Saatchi Online. The show is curated by Ana Finel Honigman, and hosted by the Sara Tecchia Roma New York gallery in New York (“your gallery” does not operate its own gallery space).

Showcasing eleven artists selected from the online site, the exhibition posits a critical analysis of art world recognition and how it is achieved, using the premise of the Saatchi site itself as a platform for its artists to discuss perceptions about art world politicking. According to Honigman, the artists were selected from Saatchi Online because she was interested in creating an “elitism for all” theme, with artists ready to take on issues about how art world insiders operate.

We see this focus in the work of Fame Theory, a Williamsburg based collaborative between filmmaker Seth Aylmer and economist Jose Serrano-Reyes, whose electronic LCD Art Ticker (2007) offers a scathing indictment of how the “value” of an artist’s work is determined. Like the ticker tapes of Wall Street, Aylmer’s Art Ticker tracks the price of an artist’s work, but the value is measured by correlating the party appearances and media mentions of the artist.

Jay Batlle’s The Minimalist Series, an appealing series of overscaled paintings, suggest satires of urbane sophistication with their teasing bits of recipes extrapolated from Mark Bittman’s New York Times culinary column, The Minimalist. Vaguely erotic titles such as In 2 Minutes, It’s All Done, are taken out of context from the recipe, adding an often witty edge to the implied narrative. Painted in minimalist black and white, the recipes are partially obscured by Expressionist swaths and swirls of paint, marker and ink that recall a chef’s saucy flourishes on plates; but that also recreate art historical, canonized masterpieces, questioning socially constructed notions of status via the media hype of gourmet food and the privileged class of art.
In a similar vein mocking hypocritical hipsters’ notions of success is video and comedy sketch by director Josh Powell. His Dilettante Films video, Just Blow (2007), mimicks advertising commercials that appeal with a high moral tone of privilege, to hedonistic partygoers who blow only the best cocaine.

Taking potshots at artworld stardom, and raising questions about authorship, appropriation and plagiarism as well as the contemporary notion of “ownership” of a particular style or technique, Eric Doeringer contributes Bootlegs. The souvenir sized, inexpensively priced reproductions of significant contemporary works of art are presented, salon style and sold on sidewalks infront of the large Chelsea galleries, at the Whitney Biennial, at art fairs, and on Saatchi Online, thereby subverting their iconic status.

Equally sardonic are Eva Roovers’ mixed media kit, How to Become a Famous Artist (2007), and Nora Klumpp’s video game, Jenny and the Labyrinth (2007), that question the validity of the online marketplace itself, demonstrating the disquieting flexibility of online identities. Also questioning the influence of identity are the photographs of Airyka Rockefeller, who ruminates on exactly how much of one’s self an artist should show, when the image of being young and cool supercedes identity in a youth-fueled contemporary emerging art community. In her Lightjet c-print, The Curtain (2007), from Self-portraits to Disappear, a woman placidly sits on a windowsill, her face obscured by the overhanging window shade, exposing her beauty to exploitation while protecting her identity from it. Likewise, photographer Bill Durgin’s spare self-portraits, set in empty white rooms, are shot in positions that alter or distort his form into anonymity, questioning the limitations of artistic identity by removing it.

Cultural dichotomies are exposed in Sara White Wilson’s C-print, La Declaration des Droits des The Gap (2007), with its images from Paris and Berlin of peeling posters and graffiti markings whose accidental juxtapositions create an unintended narrative. Miranda Maher explores the cultural psyche with Home Improvement 2 (2007), a wall piece comprised of bird nests, paper ribbons and shelves whose cast shadows whisper leftover memories of the secret selves left behind.

William Lemon III answers the show’s question, And Who Are You?, perhaps most poignantly with scented woodblock prints and audio from his multi-media art opera, Seven Acts for an Iron King (2007) that delves into the universal timelessness of creative inspiration, as opposed to the more shrill call of the contemporary art world’s muse — Fame.

e-mailE-Mail This Article

Jean Lowe
McKenzie Fine Art

By Mary Hrbacek


Artists perpetually hone and expand their creative options to suit an expressive criteria. In this regard, Jean Lowe customizes a hybrid confluence of fine art, book cover art and socio-cultural commentary in this bigger-than-life installation that utilizes papier mâché faux bookshelves to display her ironic, tongue-in-cheek social commentary, couched in the titles and illustrations of the book jackets. She employs a sharp wit in her artistic amalgam of contemporary painting, craft and cultural satire.

Our society spawns an endless supply of experts who ponder the problems that plague anxious souls in seach of social success, personal growth, and happiness. Parents who raised the so called Baby Boom generation were presumably too busy enjoying themselves to take time to instill in their children the abc’s of basic behavior — leaving them, as adults, to search for that elusive Eight-Step Program which would surely set everything right. Attentative pop psychologists and self-help gurus have found their gold mine.

Some of Lowe’s titles seem outwardly amusing; Anxiety, the Unexploited Weight Loss Tool, draws a smile until we recall the real-life afflictions of anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Craft Your Way To Mental Health is another title whose surface irony gives way to a sobering acknowedgement of mental health challenges. To be sure, however, Lowe’s message is essentially playful and light-hearted.

She is intent on poking a well-deserved jab at the hyperactive social expectations of today’s self-healers. There seems to be no end to the list of what we apparently don’t have a grip on. One has to admire, nevertheless, the persistence of our collective quest for perfection. There will always be another problem, with another set of experts to answer our questions. With this over-wrought need for acceptance, it is indeed a task for the individual to simply “be”. Americans have an unquenchable thirst for upward mobility and the status symbols that signal prestige. Simple pleasures, such as meeting friends at cafes or having a delicious luncheon with a glass of wine before heading back to the work — these are somehow foreign to us.

Lowe has created scores of volumes in papier mâché that impressively mimic book cover illustrations. Her facsimile of an Oriental rug and roughed up grand piano mock the trappings of a cliche cultured living room; there is a sense here that we have fatally bought into the myth that there are no limits to what can be achieved if we only work hard enough. On this point in particuliar, Lowe aimes carefully and hits her target square in the gut; the American work ethic, that boasts of out-producing the rest of the world, ulimately consumes even the consumer.


Copyright © 2005- by MBM Publications/The New York Art World®. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the copyright holder.