M The New York Art World ®"All You Need To Know."
M The New York Art World ®"All You Need To Know."
 

art reviews

 

 

 

Diane Arbus
Robert Miller Gallery

Inez Van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadin
Matthew Marks Gallery

Philip Lorca di Corcia
Pace Wildenstein Gallery
>>
By Nicollette Ramirez

Angela Valeria
Tribes Gallery
>>
By Lily Faust

Maggie Taylor
Laurance Miller Gallery>>
By Joel Simpson

Yin Zhaoyang
Max Protetch Gallery>>
By Mary Hrbacek

Rebbecca Holland
Moti Hasson Gallery>>
By Nicollette Ramirez

John Bell
Nary Manivong
(re) Defining Space
Mandarin Oriental Penthouse/ Time Warner Center>>
By Michael MacInnis

Remote Viewing: Invented Worlds in Contemporary Painting and Drawing
The Whitney Museum of American Art
>>
By Jari Chevalier

Soyeon Cho
A.I.R. Gallery>>
By Gu H

              


e-mailE-Mail This Article

Diane Arbus
Robert Miller Gallery

Inez Van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadin
Matthew Marks Gallery

Philip Lorca di Corcia
Pace Wildenstein Gallery

By Nicollette Ramirez

 

Utilizing photography as their medium, artists in three different shows this month — Diane Arbus, at Robert Miller; Philip Lorca di Corcia at Pace wildenstein; Inez van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadinat Mathew Marks — revel in a style of photography that captures the female form.

Other Faces Other Rooms at Robert Miller Gallery presents a collection of rarely seen black and white photographs that span the career of pioneering photographer Diane Arbus. The spiritual mother of many contemporary photographers, we see her influence on artists as diverse as Nan Goldin and Philip Lorca di Corcia.

Her photograph, Stripper, Peaches Palmer, leaning on her dressing table, Atlantic City, NJ, 1963 captures the character of the woman, her personality and her persona, in what appear to be candid of shots taken in her personal environment. Likewise, Couple in bed under paper lantern, NYC 1966 enters the private domain of a couple making love, as is evidenced by the man's erection.

The juxtaposition of the private and public realms in Arbus’ photographs often produces an awkward tension. In Nuns and their charges, Italy, 1952, the ambience of an empty room and the monumental architectural elements of New York’s mythic Penn Station are equally balanced by the intimacy of a shot that captures a wild energy in the eyes of the young girls.

In another example, Penelope Tree in her living room, 1963 shows a young girl, dressed demurely, standing in front of a sofa with a chandelier over her head. This image, together with Girl on a stoop with baby, NYC, 1962 seems to question the naturalness verus the staged element of these works, suggesting a narrative that is beautifully poignant, not only for its contemporary imagery, but because it also harkens back to images of the past, referencing paintings such as the ubiquitous Virgin Mother and Child and the little girl in Velasquez's The Maids of Honor.

Arbus, for all of her gritty realism, shared a fashion connection with the artists at the Matthew Marks Gallery. She and her husband, Allan Arbus, owned a fashion studio for some two decades.

Matthew Marks Gallery presents the second installment from a series of work by artists Inez Van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadin. Pioneers in retouched photos through digital means, the Netherlands-based couple have distilled a style of photography that is emotionally engaging, yet ethereal. The couple has enjoyed much commercial success with their collaboration in fashion. Moving between the worlds of art, fashion and design is certainly not a new venture for artists. Andy Warhol straddled art and design and the alchemy made something new; Pop Art.

The Now People, Part Two: Life On Earth presents the same vibrant, and at times scary images of women that inform the couple’s commercial work for fashion brands such as Cesare Paciotto. From a wall of collaged, magazine size images, the work moves on to a complex imagery of the "wild woman" in large format silkscreen shots that incorporate metal elements with the help of sculptor Eugene Van Lamsweerde, Inez's uncle. The use of large scrap metal and trash, which carry a street credibility in the form of graffiti and stickers, makes the collaboration between these artists more earthy and fun.

Philip Lorca di Corcia brings a gritty element to his otherwise staged, polished and sterile works at Pace Wildenstein Gallery. But this hint of the streets is not the only thing Lorca di Corcia has in common with Inez Van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadin. Dubbed Lucky Thirteen, this show's title incorporates the same number as the number of new photographs in the Van Lamsweerde and Matadin show at Matthew Marks Gallery.

Lorca di Corcia photographed strippers or "pole dancers" in and around New York, Los Angeles and Las Vegas in 2003 and 2004. The large format c-prints depict the women in the center of the picture plane in various poses on the pole; the images are at once beautiful, vulgar, vulnerable and provocative. The effect of the stagecraft, shown in darkness under a light that seems to come from the heavens, transforms the strippers into living sculptures, both enticing and repulsive. The portraits are self-titled; Juliet, Ms. Muse, Lola, Sin. With tattoos, piercings and muscles that rival those of men, these gravity defying creatures offer up mystifying portraits of themselves that linger, hauntingly, in the viewer.

D. Arbus: thru 10/15. I.V. Lamsweerde and V. Matadin thru 10/22. P. L. di Corcia: thru 10/8


e-mailE-Mail This Article

Angela Valeria
Tribes Gallery

By Lily Faust

Installed on a clothesline in the gallery’s urban backyard, Valeria’s A Bird in Flight is an Omen consists of white linens, white undergarments, a white apron and a white nightshirt, with large images of flying birds in blood red dye. The birds, two roadrunners depicted on the sheet, chickadees on the pants, finches and hawks on the other garments, are boldly painted, with the red color fully defining the form, and, in certain places, bleeding off the form to the edge of the fabric. The juxtaposition of the white linen on a clothesline in the nondescript backyard, coupled with the unexpected presence of the red birds painted across the white items, produces a haunting impression.

The work is a conflux of the personal and the political, evoking memories of womanhood and resilience, struggle and victory. Valeria, whose Italian grandmother hung out the “biancheria” (the whites) on a clothesline, remembers days from her childhood that she spent with her brother, running around the laundry, creating moving images with her shadow. Referencing that vivid and personal memory, she extends the bird motif into the political terrain of gender and identity, implicit in the blood red of the “stained” sheets. Held tautly in the upper corners, the white linen sways in the wind, bringing to mind banners of unsettling, conflicting forces, setting the stage for struggle and violence. The installation also hints at peace making, with the image of a single bird egg falling into, or, depending on one’s perspective, out of the apron pocket. The implied drama of the red birds set in flight against the white linen suggests a metaphorical balance of life and death. And, like so many birds traveling across the sky, the iconography moves us to ponder unknown destinations, rich with a visual poetry.

Through 10/31.
Maggie Taylor
Laurence Miller Gallery


e-mailE-Mail This Article

Maggie Taylor

Laurance Miller Gallery

ByJoel Simpson

Maggie Taylor's work sits squarely in the grand tradition of altered photography, a practice that goes back to the late Nineteenth Century. It has been famously explored by surrealist photographers such as Man Ray, Raoul Ubac, Hans Bellmer, George Hugnet and Maurice Tabard who utilized distortion, montage, solarization and other darkroom techniques in the 1930s. Taylor’s husband and former teacher, Jerry Uelsmann, is one of the genre’s contemporary masters. As evidenced in this show, Taylor has carved out a very particular niche for herself.

Although she supplements her imagery with her own photographs, she relies mostly on the ubiquitous software, Adobe Photoshop®, for the final result. Her style is unmistakable — as alluring as it is puzzling — capturing a nostalgic atmosphere of Victorian twilight, each image presenting a bizarre twist. Her subjects are long gone people who had their portraits taken by equally long departed pre-modern photographers. She scans these portraits, then adds color, atmosphere, background, and incongruous elements, such as insects, birds, and fish, which catapult them into a dream world. These images compel our attention, suggesting a symbolic meaning often just beyond our grasp. For example, in Subject to Change, a bearded man looks left as a denuded tree grows from his head; in Moth Dancer, a pre-adolescent girl in shorts, ballet slippers, a mask and wearing feathery moth antennae, is surrounded by luna moths attached by ribbons to her waist; and in Twilight Swim, a woman in a old-fashioned bathing cap stands hip deep in water, adorned with gold-shining whitefish around her neck and garlanded with seaweed, while a similar fish swims near her with a shark fin strapped to its back, as four other shark fins appear in the background, the darkening sky filled with a hazy moon and bright stars. The style borders on that of children’s book illustration; the visual language is sentimental, whence their charm. The juxtapositions are incongruous and the meanings enigmatic, hence their fascination.

Taylor studied photography at Yale, after majoring in philosophy, but the Yale photo department was a temple of purism, valuing the modernist aesthetic of the unaltered photographic image as manifest in the classic documentary artists, such as Robert Frank, Cartier-Bresson and Lee Friedlander. When Taylor showed her carefully constructed montages, they were dismissed as “not photography.

She went elsewhere to study, landing at the University of Florida at Gainesville, into the receptive hands of master montagist Jerry Uelsmann, who was her teacher before they married.

A recurring theme throughout Taylor’s work is the ironic contrast between the impassive expressions on the faces of her 19th century models and the extraordinary things happening to them. We know that with the long exposures made necessary by the slow photographic media in the past, subjects were told to relax their faces. A smile would have become a grimace after five seconds. But the impression portraits from that period give is that of suppressed emotions. And if it was such a repressive age, what was really going on in their psyche?

Taylor has developed a visual vocabulary of colorful fish, luna moths, morpho butterflies, rabbits, birds, mice, horses and yellowed paper to interact with and frame her subjects, suggesting an unconscious world. The subjects seem blissfully unaware that their thoughts, “materialized” through these animals and objects (and confirmed by Taylor’s titles), make them seem rather ridiculous, revealing much more than they seem to think.

The atmosphere Taylor evokes is charged with a mild magic. It comes from a quiver of effects she uses in a variety of ways: subtle vignetting, cracks in backgrounds (skies or walls), selective soft focus, and most of all her color pallet. She favors the orange-browns, sallow skin tones that seem aged like the leaves of paper in many of her images, and the green-blue-purple end of the spectrum, making the less common reds more conspicuous eye-catchers. But most effective of all is her careful use of saturation. In most of her photographs only one color is saturated; the rest are muted. Sometimes the saturated color covers only a small area, like a flower or small article of clothing. Other times it blankets half the sky; other times it occurs in an object — golden boxing gloves in Fighting Man; a flame on an aged photograph in Burn — and in a background element (the framing rust pattern in Fighting Man, the background sky glow in Burn). This color elemem-dashnt rewards the eye with a sensual pleasure that feels incongruous in the quaint settings Taylor confects, thereby strangely validating the bizarrerie of her creations. The effect is most powerful when the saturated object or field is not the main focus of attention, as for example the vertically striped orange wastebasket in The Man with Too Much Time, which depicts a man throwing paper airplanes (presumably before real ones were invented), a very subtle effect.

The exhibition catalogue is published by the Adobe company, under the rubric of a Photoshop Master Class. What? Taylor is about to give her secrets away at the same time as she displays her work? Actually, her Photoshop operations are only very generally described, illustrating more about her care in constructing each detail than the actual step-by-step Photoshop procedure. But the catalogue is much more than that, including chapters devoted to various photographers’ and critics’ appreciations of Taylor’s work, as well as a generous amount of information on Taylor’s background and development as an artist. The reproductions capture the colors well, and there is an appropriate visual leitmotif of colored threads throughout. The interviews with Taylor herself reveal much more about how she arrives at her images, collecting objects to scan that appeal to her, than it does about those elusive deep meanings in her work. For the latter, we have the work itself.
through 10/29.


e-mailE-Mail This Article

Yin Zhaoyang
Max Protetch Gallery

By Mary Hrbacek

Yin explores the power of iconic architectural and sculptural monuments in large scale paintings that define historic political eras. The role of myth in the shaping of a unified Chinese social order is emphasized in works that express the fading of memory, by the use of fading forms executed in soft, undefined contours. This technique is reminiscent of German painter Gerhard Richter. The monuments that shape the relatively recent advent of the communist era are themselves subject to the rigors of time and the degeneration of weather. From the period of the dynasties to an age of collective utopia, memories of these vanguard times are rapidly disappearing into the past as yet another epoch is burgeoning in China today.

Several paintings of groups, all from the works entitled Utopia I,II and III, depict soldiers working in concert to achieve and celebrate their common objectives. In Plaza II, the people are depicted on a tiny scale, all converging on a monolithic white structure. These images seem to refer to the strength that results from cooperative efforts in which individual consciousness is submerged in the interests of a unified goal. The idealized, Social Realist sculptures in the Utopia series express an almost religious fervor that depict bleakness and sacrifice through the use of gray stone and uniform stylized figures. The painting, Mao Anyuan, depicts the Chinese leader on one of his historic walks in the countryside, where he is considered a religious deity or prophet. His direct contact with the populace had a great emotional impact on the young Chinese of his time.

Yin blends the past with the present, in addressing issues of collective consciousness, history, and the fading of memory in images of public squares and memorials that have served to give substance to the myths that have unified Chinese societal structure.
9/8 through 10/3


e-mailE-Mail This Article

Rebecca Holland

Moti Hasson Gallery

By Lily Faust

Leaning nonchalant against the gallery walls, Holland’s narrow vertical panels stand seventy-eight inches tall. They are made from poured Jolly-Rancher candy, lime green, with medium size squares made of sugar, the color of watermelon-pink. Further in, on the floor, we see jade-like chunks of green candy, crushed and spread out within the neat perimeperimeters of a rectangle. In a separate room, a white wall subtly shimmers with light reflected off the minute crystals uniformly stuck on its flat surface. After inquiry, we learn that these works are formed by melted sugar, either applied directly onto the wall, or formed into planks and sheets like hardened candy.

Exquisitely crafted, these geometric structures have an elegant and deceptive presence. There is sense of beauty inherent to their fragile existence. As objects hinged on impermanence, they are mystifying and possibly worrisome. Assumptions previously made about the make-up of the panels, that they are made of glass, or of resin or of plexiglass, shift into a fascination with the knowledge of their truly ephemeral nature as candy; yes, this work is edible.

On an entirely different scale, two shelves at one end of the gallery we find Holland’s most recent series, Pink Debris and “Yellow Debris. Consisting of little blobs of pink and yellow/green candy that form a ball around bits of detritus that she picked off the streets, this series departs conceptually and formally from the pristine geometry of the earlier works in the show. Discarded items, such as a hairpin, a toothpick (still in its wrapper), a rusty nail, a bottle cap, a matchbook cover, and other tiny matter are recycled into a jewel-like existence by being dipped in the sumptuous colored candy. Like a beautifying project that refuses to leave any object untouched, Holland encapsulates tiny bits of material into an endearing hybrid version of itself and a dab of artful candy.

At some point the dialectic between sugar as edible material (sweet, crunchy, soluble) and sugar as artistic medium (crystalline, ephemeral, shimmering, sensual, and sticky) becomes a point of contemplation underscoring the work. The use of pure candy in building immaculate panels that capture light is an idea that could probably go further than these initial steps suggest. Beyond their elegant appearance, the works point to rich associations with ideas of sweetness, sensual pleasure and seduction.

Still, in the luscious transparency of thin planks of sugar in lime green and twilight pink, the oddly delicious experience of the color is tasted, oddly enough, right in the retina. So much for a case of synesthesia; the stimulation of one sense that elicits an experience in another.
Through 10/20.


e-mailE-Mail This Article


John Bell

Nary Manivong

(re) Defining Space

Mandarin Oriental Penthouse/ Time Warner Center

By Micheal MacInnis

Separating the dancer from the dance; content from context and form from function can be tricky to say the least. At what point does a party become an art happening? We’ve got art fairs, and alternative art fairs and alternative art spaces and then something else. Nu Skin cosmetics executive Sandie Tillotson, championing her Force For Good Foundation (www.forceforgood.org), had the idea last month, at the start of the art season, to invite a gathering of art crowd insiders to mingle amidst a cacophony of art, design and fashion creators in her penthouse suite atop the newly anointed Mandarin Oriental in New York.

The focal point of the posh, mini art event was a selection of thirteen design orientated relief paintings by John Bell, which resonated with the hyper-high-rise industrial architecture of the surrounding space; at some eighty floors up, the new Time Warner Center nearly rivals the old WTC towers for its commanding presence in the sky. Although the work borrows a bit too heavilly from Frank Stella, Bell manages to stop short of producing knock-offs by connecting his work to a different environment and referencing his own experiences.

Against this backdrop, fashion designer Nary Manivong introduced a new collection of fall fashions, rounding out another evening of art and fun in the new, gentler New York.

Ed Note: For more information please contact Mary Fresques at 801.599.2087 or Dan scwartz at 212.947.4557

Remote Viewing: Invented Worlds in Contemporary Painting and Drawing
The Whitney Museum of American Art


e-mailE-Mail This Article

Remote Viewing: Invented Worlds in Contemporary Painting and Drawing
The Whitney Museum of American Art

By Jari Chevalier

Taken on its own terms, this exhibition of paintings and drawings conjures a world of psychic surveillance. These are not merely imagined worlds, but artistic renderings of clairvoyant activity that hint at a deeper reality. But they are also invented. And they are also tongue-in-cheek. This is a show that both takes a stand and then doubles over.

A Kafkaesque wall drawing and text by Ben Marcus, Peterson’s Forensics, introduces the show. Essentially a technical diagram of a fictional machine with an absurd sidebar that reads like a self-help manual authored by a psychotic, this work sets the tone for what follows

Marcus’s work, among the most interesting in the show, provides a textbook case of insanity masquerading as logic, satirizing the global machinery of incoherence with its attenuating laugh-out-loud moments amidst dark implications.

The show’s centerpiece is an installation room by Matthew Ritchie, who made four paintings for the show, connected by his signature black lattice wall drawings and a central 3-D lattice-work viewing station of black iron.

Dubbed The Living Will, this work reads like a contemporary American version of a Tibetan tanghka. A traditional tanghka’s stacked and ordered immensities offer serenity in the face of the inconceivable. But here, Ritchie’s eyes of consciousness redoubled into infinity, and his Ever-living One, are torqued and blown apart in a sea of nets and snakes. A swarming order, that is too layered to depict, leaves us dazzled, unsettled, and powerless. We are caught in the throes of something that will swallow us before we’re finished having fun with it.

Of the eight masters brought together for the show, Ati Maier and Julie Mehretu, offer their all-over-you, all-at-once multiple perspectives in very different scales. Maier packs heaven and earth into an energetic space that explodes and zooms. Flat antique comic book tones on her small paintings seem to illustrate a world that is being destroyed by its own romantic notions of achievement. We have the familiar symbols; the skull and crossbones, the mushroom cloud.

Mehretu’s oversized architectures, arenas overpopulated with comet-tail lines, flags and logos depict a game which seems to operate by its own rules, apart from the player. In her most recent work, Untitled (created for this show and affixed directly to the wall), she has dispensed with the architectural layers of grids. There is just the movement, wind through the grass, and the depiction of white space. This new work, nevertheless, depends on her earlier work for its power.

Carroll Dunham and Terry Winters, the grand-daddies of the group, offer mature works in their signature styles. Winters’ paintings are fields of vibrant energy, while narrative, typewritten text by Ben Marcus adds a wry amnesiac intrigue to the drawings. Dunham’s work gives us his idiosyncratic and tragicomic world of war, absurd machismo, urban dwellings and madness.

The show’s metaphysical nadir is found in the menacing, hallucinogenic visions of Steve DiBenedetto, dominated by helicopters, ferris wheels, and octopi in El Greco colors and lights. Disappearance, a masterful brown pencil drawing dominated by an octopus, makes more of an impact through its monochromatic simplicity.

The ubiquity of tentacles and snaky shapes, as well as whorls and vortices in the work of most of these artists conveys that their collective psychic radar enters the deep sea, the entrails of the body, and outer space — all at once.

A uniting factor here is the quixotic whisper from the work of all these artists, which undercuts the seriousness of the artistic enterprise and conveys a sense of powerlessness for all the bravado, as if the best of the best of contemporary artists can do little more than duel with windmills.

through 10/9.
Soyeon Cho
A.I.R. Gallery


e-mailE-Mail This Article

Soyeon Cho

A.I.R. Gallery

By Gu H

Soyeon Cho rescues everyday objects — the humbler the better — to lovingly construct breathtaking installations. Twigs, plastic utensils and Q-tips; these banal objects which usually are never given a second thought before being discarded are invited by Ms. Cho to participate in wildly imaginative and complex structures. They are not so much transformed (for both the material and the method of putting the installations together are completely transparent) as arranged, much like arranging flowers. These once unlovely “flowers” take on personalities in their new context.

Even in the gaudy glory of the larger pieces, because the materials remain so recognizable, the installations are both assertive and modest. Each has a completely different feel, yet all share a poetic quality. Cinderella Castle, made from hundreds of white plastic forks hot-glue gunned together, suggests a bud-like form. Suspended from the ceiling by a slender white chain that is allowed to pass through the sculpture and onto the floor, the piece reads like an accidental, biological release; there is something poignant in the celebration of imperfection.

All of Ms. Cho’s works have an intimation of their eventual fate, as agents of decay — returning to a state of disregard and neglect. There is on one hand the idea that art should be about the sublime, to aim towards a spiritual, elevated state; then there is a mindset that embraces the world as it is, even in its most banal elements. These works manage to do both; they embrace the most humdrum of everyday existence while saying something meaningful about the world.
through 10/9.

 


 
 

Copyright © 2005- by MBM Publications/The New York Art World®. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the copyright holder.